Global Terrorism, Global Determination
Evidential or circumstantial? It actually makes no difference. If Iran’s claims about Pakistan’s role in the Wednesday suicide attack against Shi’a mourners are based on firm evidence, then Islamabad is legally bound to cooperate with Iran in order to arrest the agents and masterminds of the attack. Based on various MoUs signed between Tehran and Islamabad, neither country should host opposition groups. In this regard, Iran is absolutely entitled to demand Pakistan’s cooperation.
Tehran’s claim may of course be circumstantial. But in all of its suspicions, Iran has the right to view its eastern neighbor with some doubt. In Pakistan’s security strategy, the volatile state of Baluchistan—Pakistan’s westernmost state adjacent to Iran’s Sistan-va-Baluchistan province—is controlled by the country’s intelligence service, ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence). The claim that the all-powerful ISI might have been unaware of Baluchistan’s comings and goings is dubious. Even if the ISI did not plan the attack, Iran expects it to exercise further control over the border so that terrorists cannot exploit Pakistan’s territory for launching attacks against Iran.
Meanwhile, Islamabad can benefit from cooperation with Tehran. For one thing, separatist sentiments are much more powerful in the Pakistani part of Baluchistan, compared with the Iranian part. Instability in Iran’s Baluchistan will have exponential reverberations on the other side of the border, causing much trouble for a country already known as a failed state. Battling against secessionism and sectarianism is advantageous for both countries.